Click here to
view Hurricane Ike pictures |
Hurricane Ike caused tens of
millions of damages to homes and
businesses across Houston and the
Greater Houston Area including
Galveston, Boliver, Bay City,
Friendswood, Clear Lake, League
City,
Beaumont, Port Arthur
& other areas along the Southeast
Texas Coast. Some insurance
companies will claim that the losses
and claims are merely flood and/or
give reasons why the claims are not
covered or should be reduced in
value. |
Many insurance
companies will overlook
the fact that Hurricane
Ike has caused not only
structural damage to the
roof and home, but water
damage to the interior
and contents of a home
as well. In many cases,
water damage should be
covered. The Sheena Law
Firm will fight for your
rights.
Click here for more
information. |
|
People buy insurance in a
spirit of trust. They feel assured that the
insurance policy will bear the heavy
financial responsibility if property is
damaged or a family member or friend is
seriously hurt.
But sometimes the
insurance company views the situation from a
different point of view. We have experience
with insurance companies that act in bad
faith against their policy holders. Over the
years we have helped many people recover
full payment from their insurance companies.
It’s all about doing what’s right.
We are
dedicated to holding profit hungry insurance
companies responsible for the promises they
make to their clients. All of us
purchase insurance--for our homes,
automobiles, health, etc.-and assume that,
should we become ill or disabled or suffer
serious damage to our property, that
insurance coverage will protect us.
Unfortunately, that is not always the case.
Insurance companies sometimes put profits
ahead of fulfilling their obligations to
their policyholders.
In
those situations, policyholders have a right
to sue the insurance companies for "bad
faith," in order to force them to honor
their contractual obligations, and, in
certain circumstances, to compensate the
policyholder for their emotional distress
and/or to pay punitive damages.
When an insurance company
violates principles or regulations governing
insurance law, it may constitute insurance
company “bad faith.” Bad faith essentially
refers to unfair treatment by an insurer,
and can include:
-
Discriminating on the basis of race
-
Denying a claim
-
Wrongful delay of payment or insurance
reimbursement
-
Stalling in making a decision on an
insurance claim
-
Requiring unreasonable actions or
documentation by an insured.
In
addition to the value of the claim itself,
an insurance company acting in bad faith in
an insurance dispute may also be liable for
damages for causing emotional distress to
the plaintiff, and perhaps even punitive
damages if the conduct or the pattern of
conduct is outrageous.
What are
"Bad Faith Insurance Claims?"
This term is applied when an insurance
company's denial of coverage is wrongful
and/or constitutes bad faith. Generally,
this reference describes a carrier's
contemptuous conduct and unscrupulous greed
in their effort to avoid paying a
policyholder's just claim. Insurance
policies are confusing, ambiguous and filled
with loopholes by design - not just
coincidence. Comprehensive interpretation is
difficult for trained professionals and rare
for laypersons.
It 's also not unusual for insurers to offer
promotional materials to help sell the
policy that contain representations contrary
to the policy that is actually issued.
Prudent saving of any informational
brochures and sales aids could prove
valuable for future claims disputes.
Benefits discrepancies between offers and
actual delivered underwritten policies are
particularly widespread with regard to
umbrella coverage.
One very well known carrier publicly
advertised that its umbrella policy will
protect the insured from suits relating to:
false arrest, false imprisonment,
wrongful eviction wrongful detention,
malicious prosecution humiliation;
libel, slander, defamation of character
or invasion of rights of privacy; and
assault and battery.
However, if a claim is actually filed for
one of these, the insurance company may
assert that Insurance Code -- which states
that an insurer is not liable for the
willful act of the insured -- precludes
coverage for intentional torts. Such conduct
approaches actionable bait-and-switch sales
tactics. The consequences of misrepresenting
policy coverage in promotional material
range from fraud-based punitive damages to
bad faith liability.
By law, these discrepancies must be
interpreted in favor of the policyholder. If
any clause in the insurance contract was
unconscionable at the time it was drafted,
the court may refuse to enforce the contract
or the offending stipulations. The insurer
is responsible for meeting the objectively
reasonable expectations of the insured and
coverage must be provided accordingly.
Virtually every bad faith case reported over
the past 20 years discusses the "peace of
mind" motivation in purchasing insurance.
This is a key motivation for the purchase of
indemnity products. Although the law
requires an insurance company to consider
the interests of the insured at least as
much as its own, if there is any excuse for
an insurance company to deny or limit
coverage of a large claim, it probably will
try to do so. Insurance companies are
masters of claims negotiation.
If you feel you have been
wronged by an insurance company, please
contact us today.